More Information

  • News
  • Links
  • News

    Rhinophyma: Carbon dioxide laser with computerized scanner is still an outstanding treatment

    Shueh-Wei Lim,1 Shueh-Wen Lim1,2 and Phillip Bekhor3
    1Department of Dermatology, Austin Health, 2University of Melbourne, and 3Laser Unit, Department of Dermatology, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia


    Abstract

    The cosmetic deformity produced by rhinophyma is characterized by nodular hypertrophy of the nasal skin. A retrospective review and analysis of nine con- secutive patients with moderate and major rhino- phyma treated with scanned carbon dioxide laser was performed. A particular method of continuous scanner use is described. This report demonstrates excellent cosmetic results and no major postoperative complications or recurrence of the condition after 1 year of follow up for seven patients. Two more patients had been followed up for 1 month at the time this paper was written. Scanned carbon dioxide laser is safe and highly effective treatment for rhinophyma.

    Key words: carbon dioxide laser, continuous wave, nasal hypertrophy, rhinophyma, rosacea, scanner.


    Introduction

    Rhinophyma is a rosacea variant, primarily affecting middle-aged or elderly Caucasian men. It is characterized by a progressive thickening of the nasal skin, which produces soft-tissue hypertrophy of the nose.1 Morphologically, the nose appears deformed, with thickening and nodule formation. The surface is erythematous and telangiectatic with enlarged pores. The process affects mainly the lower two-thirds of the nose.2 Treatment options for rhinophyma include surgical excision, electrocautery, cryosurgery or laser ablation, with newer technologies such as Erbium: yttrium–aluminium–garnet (Er : YAG) being increasingly used.3,4 Disadvantages associated with each of these treatment modalities have been described, such as excessive bleeding, dispersion of blood, postoperative pain and unsatisfactory cosmetic results.5,6 This study evaluates the benefits of a particular method of scanned carbon dioxide laser therapy in the treatment of rhinophyma. This method is not a well-published technique in the treatment of rhinophyma at this time.7,8


    Methods

    A retrospective chart review and analysis of sequential clinical photographs were performed on nine consecutive patients who underwent scanned carbon dioxide laser treatment (Sharplan 40C with SilkTouch/FeatherTouch scanner; Sharplan/ESC Laser Inc, Allendale, NJ, USA) for rhinophyma from October 2002 to September 2008. All of the patients were Caucasian men aged between 49 and 84 years old. We categorized our patients into three categories,9 in which rhinophyma was classified as follows: minor rhinophyma, telangiectasias and mild thickening or textural change on the nose; moderate rhinophyma, thickening of the nose and early formation of lobules; and major rhinophyma, presence of both nasal hypertrophy and prominent lobules. Three patients had major rhinophyma and the remaining six patients had moderate rhinophyma.

    All laser procedures were performed by a single operator. After informed consent, all patients received local regional nerve blocks consisting of xylocaine 1% with adrenaline 1 : 100 000 to anaesthetize the surgical area. All patients required only one procedure. On average, each procedure took less than 30 min with the carbon dioxide laser with scanner system. Seven patients were on concurrent antibiotics for treatment of their rosacea.



    Figure 1, Patient A

    The settings used for the Sharplan 40C laser in continuous SilkTouch mode were at 20–30 W with a 1.2–3.0-mm spot size for debulking. (Table 1) The endpoint in the rhinophymatous area was ablation to achieve correction of deformity at the same time as leaving a honeycomb appearance of residual sebaceous glands to allow for reepithelialization. There is continuous vacuum suctioning of the smoke during the procedure via a suction exhaust system built into the distance tip. The procedure is completed with a single blending pass to the nonrhinophymatous areas within the cosmetic unit. Parameters used were FeatherTouch mode at 22–40 W with a 5–6-mm spot set to single scan.

    The nose was dressed with a hydrocolloid fluid absorbent wound dressing (DuoDERM Thin) changed daily, allowing healing by re-epithelialization. Patients were followed up over the next few weeks and for up to 1 year. Sequential photographs were taken before and after treatment.


    Results

    The nine patients were followed up in clinic and re-epithelialization was observed to take place within 2 weeks. There were no postoperative complications such as bleeding, pain or infection (Table 1). None of the seven patients followed up for 1 year experienced recurrence of the condition. Two patients had only been followed up for 1 month at the time this paper was written. Clinically good nasal contour and colour, ala symmetry and minimal scarring were achieved in all cases. All nine patients were very satisfied with the final cosmetic results. Four patients (patients A, H, I and F) are shown with pre- and postoperative views in Figures 1–4.


    Figure 2, Patient H


    Figure 3, Patient I


    Figure 4, Patient F

    Two patients required further treatment of their nose. Patient F required a touch-up treatment at the nasal tip for a slight depression. He had blending of the edges of the depression in continuous scan FeatherTouch mode at 30 W with a 5-mm spot size. Patient B had vascular laser treatment 6 months later for erythema.


    Discussion

    The carbon dioxide laser was reported in 1980 for the treatment of rhinophyma.10 It offers excellent precision, marked haemostatic effects, minimal complications and satisfactory cosmetic results. Carbon dioxide laser emits light energy in the infrared portion of the spectrum at 10 600 nm.11 It targets intra- and extracellular water, resulting in water vaporization and tissue loss. It also produces effective haemostasis for blood vessels up to 0.5 mm in diameter.11 Current-generation carbon dioxide lasers limit residual thermal injury in the skin by producing high-energy laser light with tissue dwell times shorter that the thermal relaxation time of the epidermis. Pulsed and scanned carbon dioxide laser systems have been developed to limit carbon dioxide laser dwell times. Our Sharplan carbon dioxide laser with a SilkTouch/FeatherTouch scanner generates a continuous beam of laser energy that moves rapidly across an area of skin with the aid of the computerized scanner.12 The Sharplan carbon dioxide laser focuses to a 0.1-mm point in cutting mode, but the use of the scanner allows the 'cutting point' to widen to up to 3 mm in diameter, acting like a broad-based drill bit. The technique is best described as circular painting, which sculpts the nose to the desired contour. This technique is fast because it does not need multiple passes or wiping as the tissue appears to vaporize completely with treatment. Without the use of the carbon dioxide laser in continuous scanned mode, treatment is much slower and requires ongoing wiping of white powdered surface debris. Likewise, the use of carbon dioxide laser in continuous wave mode without a scanner also requires wiping between passes and is probably associated with a wider zone of thermal damage.

    Power settings of the scanned carbon dioxide laser vary somewhat depending on how quickly the operator works. Slower hand movement necessitate lower wattage, whereas quicker hand movement allows use of higher wattage. We found our settings (Table 1) to be optimal with the laser we used. The endpoint was a honeycomb appearance with reasonable shape and expressible sebum. Expressible sebum is useful for ensuring that the ablation is not carried out too deeply.4

    Classification of the severity of rhinophyma has been varied,9,13,14 and has been based on the extent of the disease, descriptive analysis or how extensive the disease is across the regions of the nose. These have not been useful for effective comparison of pre- and post-treatment photos. We used our chosen classification9 mainly as an indication of the degree of rhinophyma we selected for treatment with our carbon dioxide laser.

    Reported side-effects of carbon dioxide laser include erythema, hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation, haemorrhage, fistula formation and notching15. One of our patients experienced a small nasal tip depression that was treated with blending of the edges to an acceptable contour. Another patient had treatment of nose erythema using vascular laser with good effect 6 months later. Our patients demonstrated re-epithelization over 2 weeks, consistent with the current literature16. Erythema, which has been reported to persist for up to several months, was not a concern for most of our patients given the remarkable improvement they had gained, and our patients were very pleased with their improvement9. None of our seven patients experienced a recurrence of rhinophyma in the 1-year follow up, consistent with other studies of up to 10 years follow up.9,15

    Older techniques that are still used include decortication, which involves subtotal excision, leaving the base of sebaceous follicles to aid in re-epithelization. Decortication can be performed by scalpel, dermatome, dermabrasion, Weck blade or electrocautery.17,18 The main problem with some of these sculpturing techniques is that bleeding leads to poor visualisation, making tissue removal much less precise.18 Deep dermabrasion can result in significant scarring19 and there may also be a sharp demarcation surrounding the edges of the treatment site and adjacent normal tissue, leaving a poor cosmetic result.17,20 Electrocautery can solve the bleeding problem and has been reported to produce similar results to carbon dioxide laser treatment.21 However, electrocautery leaves a wide zone of thermalinduced tissue destruction, which can result in poor texture or hypertrophic scarring.21,22 Carbon dioxide laser has the advantage of limited thermal effect, reducing the risk of scarring. There is also less postoperative pain, probably due to the ability of the carbon dioxide laser to seal nerve endings.22

    In recent years, Er : YAG lasers have been increasingly reported in the literature, along with new dual-mode Er : YAG lasers.3,4,25 Er : YAG lasers have been reported to have the advantage of more precise ablation with minimal residual thermal damage and less severe and shorter duration of side-effects (e.g. erythema). However, Er : YAG lasers have less spectacular results and poor coagulative effect. Er : YAG lasers tend to cause heavier bleeding with decreased visibility.24 In comparison, the carbon dioxide laser has been found to provide excellent haemostasis during resection, maximising visualisation with minimal complications,15 similar to our experience. We do note however, that lasers are more capital intensive and result in higher fees compared with other physical techniques, but believe that the ease of use, accuracy and precision the lasers offer justify the increased cost.

    Our patients demonstrate excellent results with scanned carbon dioxide laser treatment. Scanned carbon dioxide laser may now be considered an older technology, but, in our opinion, it is well-established, reliable, fast, and remains an outstanding treatment.

    Download case report


    References

    1. Bogetti P, Boltri M, Spagnoli G, Dolcet M. Surgical treatment of rhinophyma: a comparison of techniques. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 2002; 26: 57–60.
    2. Rohrich RJ, Griffin JR, Adams WP Jr. Rhinophyma: review and update. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2002; 110: 860–9; quiz 870. 
    3. Fincher EF, Gladstone HB. Use of a dual-mode erbium : YAG laser for the surgical correction of rhinophyma. Arch. Facial. Plast. Surg. 2004; 6: 267–71.
    4. Goon PK, Dalal M, Peart FC. The gold standard for decortica- tion of rhinophyma: combined erbium-YAG/CO2 laser. Aesthetic. Plast. Surg. 2004; 28: 456–60.
    5. Hsu CK, Lee JY, Wong TW. Good cosmesis of a large rhino- phyma after carbon dioxide laser treatment. J. Dermatol. 2006; 33: 227–9.
    6. Simo R, Sharma VL. Treatment of rhinophyma with carbon dioxide laser. J. Laryngol. Otol. 1996; 110: 841–6.
    7. Huilgol SC, Poon E, Calonje E, Seed PT, Huilgol RR, Markey AC, Barlow RJ. Scanned continuous wave CO2 laser resurfac- ing: a closer look at the different scanning modes. Dermatol. Surg. 2001; 27: 467–70.
    8. Skoulakis CE, Papadakis CE, Papadakis DG, Bizakis JG, Kyrmizakis DE, Helidonis ES. Excision of rhinophyma with a laser scanner handpiece: a modified technique. Rhinology 2002; 40: 83–7.
    9. el-Azhary RA, Roenigk RK, Wang TD. Spectrum of results after treatment of rhinophyma with the carbon dioxide laser. Mayo Clin. Proc. 1991; 66: 899–905.
    10. Shapshay SM, Strong MS, Anastasi GW, Vaughan CW. Removal of rhinophyma with the carbon dioxide laser: a preliminary report. Arch. Otolaryngol. 1980; 106: 257–9.
    11. Tanzi EL, Lupton JR, Alster TS. Lasers in dermatology: four decades of progress. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2003; 49: 1–31; quiz 31–34.
    12. Alster TS, Nanni CA, Williams CM. Comparison of four carbon dioxide resurfacing lasers. A clinical and histopatho- logic evaluation. Dermatol. Surg. 1999; 25: 153–8; discussion 159.
    13. Clark DP, Hanke CW. Electrosurgical treatment of rhino- phyma. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1990; 22: 831–7.
    14. Freeman BS. Reconstructive rhinoplasty for rhinophyma. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1970; 46: 265–70.
    15. Karim Ali M, Streitmann MJ. Excision of rhinophyma with the carbon dioxide laser: a ten-year experience. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 1997; 106: 952–55.
    16. Tanzi EL, Alster TS. Single-pass carbon dioxide versus multiple-pass Er : YAG laser skin resurfacing: a comparison of postoperative wound healing and side-effect rates. Dermatol. Surg. 2003; 29: 80–4.
    17. Haas A, Wheeland RG. Treatment of massive rhinophyma with the carbon dioxide laser. J. Dermatol. Surg. Oncol. 1990; 16: 645–9.
    18. Redett RJ, Manson PN, Goldberg N, Girotto J, Spence RJ. Methods and results of rhinophyma treatment. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2001; 107: 1115–23.
    19. Ross EV, Naseef GS, McKinlay JR, Barnette DJ, Skrobal M, Grevelink J, Anderson RR. Comparison of carbon dioxide laser, erbium : YAG laser, dermabrasion, and dermatome: a study of thermal damage, wound contraction, and wound healing in a live pig model: implications for skin resurfacing. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2000; 42: 92–105.
    20. Fisher WJ. Rhinophyma: its surgical treatment. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1970; 45: 466–70.
    21. Greenbaum SS, Krull EA, Watnick K. Comparison of CO2 laser and electrosurgery in the treatment of rhinophyma. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1988; 18: 363–8.
    22. Wheeland RG, Bailin PL, Ratz JL. Combined carbon dioxide laser excision and vaporization in the treatment of rhino- phyma. J. Dermatol. Surg. Oncol. 1987; 13: 172–7.
    23. Trelles MA. Laser resurfacing today and the ‘cook book’ approach: a recipe for disaster? J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2004; 3: 237–41.
    24. Orenstein A, Haik J, Tamir J, Winkler E, Frand J, Zilinsky I, Kaplan H. Treatment of rhinophyma with Er : YAG laser. Lasers Surg. Med. 2001; 29: 230–5.

    Return to news listings >

    Got a Question for Us?

    If you have a question about any of our procedures, use the contact form below or call us for more information.

    or Freecall: 1800-LASERS